Conscious visibility^LJ and contents of knowledge^LJ closing a gap on the world
Consciousness is a force that extends outward from the soul, inside eternity. I call it a soul for lack of a better term. Conscious visibility refers to the limits and extent of knowledge, and the possible distance of awareness to permeate the universe. It fills in space with light detection. The observable universe is not a physically binding limitation but an epistemic barrier preventing humans from knowing beyond what they have learned. It correlates to knowledge and storage of information. This should be exciting. Knowing where the barrier is, is cause for celebration. It imparts knowledge about the potential. One must speculate in order to find truth. In other words, even if we fumble in the dark, we might not see truth, but we can feel it, smell it, taste it and hopefully hear it.
Conscious visibility is in a sense, a visual sense, but also like a force, or field. It is a facet of visual perception and light sensation but rather than being receptive it outwardly moves. Related to attention and visual awareness, conscious visibility refers to the way knowledge constructs reality in the visual space. There is a conscious field, a range, and a content restriction for conscious visibility. But we should not look at this as problematic. It isolates relevance by creating the individual’s universe. Hilary Lawson calls this closure. He believes perspective, or frame of reference is closure on an otherwise endless amount of potential. A closure on the world is what distinguishes you, and me, from the object, and each other. The amount of consciousness available is a direct influence on population numbers. An ocean of matter, (atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks etc), provides buoyancy for the vessel of consciousness. A mathematical relationship between cosmic distance and conscious minds permeates universal spacetime.
If you dissolve your conception of physical identity into individual consciousness in a human being (that is if you consider subjectivity to be in an analogue space relationship to other enclosed subjective entities, but without distinct physical properties) then there is no need to conceptualize consciousness as residing inside the brain. However, it is in contact with mental processes. Consciousness is duality. Individual subjectivity is a particle of time. The sum of knowledge contained in human storage is directly correlated to unseen influence of energy in the universe. Therefore, individual consciousness has particle and field-like qualities, like a photon. Space can be perceived like a 3-dimensional grid that selects the location of a particle as it moves into its proximity. The photon equation indicates the reducible size of the field of conscious visibility. It reverses the assumption about how we construct the information we see with our mind.
Arguably the qualitative feature of consciousness does not fully develop with brain activity. Perhaps there is a signal or transmission of consciousness from an unknown source that interacts with electrical signals in the brain.
We should look for clues in religion. I believe each religion has an area of expertise. Hindu religion appears to intuit cosmological knowledge that is yet to be fully realized scientifically. Buddhism, the mind and self. Meditation is widely accepted as having lifestyle benefits. There is an atypical journey with which knowledge flows from intuitive wisdom to scientific knowledge. We intuit something, then as we develop more detailed knowledge, we step backwards as a society in order to explain its reasoning. Although superstition has a purpose, it becomes dangerous if it is selected for its content specifically.
Political climate influences us in science. We move in line with the times. This is unproblematic in the long run because we gain a more crystallized intelligence for our regression. That is, in other words, we create scientific knowledge to explain what we intuitively know to be correct. In the short term it is problematic because people who intuitively know something, they can be ridiculed and ostracized for their correct assumptions. It is unwise to dismiss and ostracize people who take outlandish views. But we must work within scientific method to have a thorough understanding of how things work. The human mind can figure things out without knowing how they work, but if we want to produce greener technologies and protect our climate then we must understand how to build things. It really is one of the most fascinating qualities of human reasoning. It casts light over an otherwise dark universe.
